Post details: New halo from spotlight beam

Sunday, October 18, 2009

Permalink 17:18, by marko riikonen Email   English (EU)
Categories: Displays

New halo from spotlight beam

It's been before our noses for a year already ( 1 ): the weak colored arc reaching far outside the 46° halo in the display observed on the night of 5/6 November 2008 in Rovaniemi. I have thought of it as some sort of 46° supralateral arc extension below the horizon. But something has not felt quite right with that and I finally decided to run a simulation.

The halo arises in column crystals from 3-5-1 and 3-6-1 raypaths ( 2 ). Thus it is not 46° supralateral arc. Rather, these raypaths make it a reflection of 46° supralateral arc. If circumnadir arc had been visible in the display, this halo would have been tangent to it ( 3 ) similarly as normal 46° supralateral arc is tangent to circumzenith arc.

The simulation above was made with column and random oriented crystals. Crystals towards triangular shape seemed to provide best overall fit with the photo. Light source elevation for the simulation was -11.5 degrees. The simulation on the right is filtered, showing some common halos together with the new halo arc.

What should we call this? Reflected (46°) supralateral arc or sub(-46°) supralateral arc? If we were to choose the former, the "Ounasvaara arc" ( 4 ) which arises from similar raypath (8-4-1) in Parry crystals, could be then called reflected (46°) Parry supralateral arc.

Simulations and crystal raypath figures are from Jukka Ruoskanen's software.

Trackback address for this post:

http://www.ursa.fi/blogit/htsrv/trackback.php?tb_id=2464

Comments, Trackbacks:

Comment from: Ágnes Kiricsi [Member] Email · http://atmosphericoptics.blogspot.com/
I'm speechless again. It's amazing that there's still more to discover. Marko, hat's off.
PermalinkPermalink 2009-10-18 @ 17:33
Comment from: Jari Luomanen [Member] Email · http://jari.pic.fi/kuvat/
So this is the 8th new halo for Marko within two years? A record surely never ever broken in future. Congratulations!
PermalinkPermalink 2009-10-18 @ 20:51
Comment from: Lauri Kangas [Visitor] Email
Extremely interesting finds. How much more hidden stuff might there be in the photos of last winter?
PermalinkPermalink 2009-10-18 @ 21:56
Comment from: jukka ruoskanen [Visitor] Email
Well, that was a surprise! Among all interesting features in last season's photos this one was one of the most obvious, but was left unnoticed. Good work.
PermalinkPermalink 2009-10-18 @ 23:18
Comment from: marko riikonen [Visitor] Email
There is no more to be found at least from my photos. I have meticulously scrutinized them. This case visibility was loud and clear, but apparently nobody thought it could of significance.

Yes, this was the eight new halo, Jari. But hey folks, winter is coming and who knows what will be discovered again.
PermalinkPermalink 2009-10-18 @ 23:22
Comment from: Michael ELLESTAD [Member] Email
I saw that sub-supralateral in that one photo and I was waiting for you to find it. I got my 4th elliptical halo this year woot woot woot!!
PermalinkPermalink 2009-10-19 @ 03:39
Comment from: marko riikonen [Visitor] Email
Thanks for leaving the discovery for me, Michael. And congrats on the fourth ellipse, that's pretty amazing. Two more to go to be even with Sillanpää. If not this year, next year you will make a new record.
PermalinkPermalink 2009-10-19 @ 11:11
Comment from: Michael ELLESTAD [Member] Email
Thanks Marko I just got more halos today and the rare stuff was bright parry, bright 120d parhelia, bright 46d infra, and the shocker WEGENER ARCS!!!
PermalinkPermalink 2009-10-20 @ 05:18
Comment from: marko riikonen [Visitor] Email
Sounds good, Michael. By the way, where are the odd radius display photos from last summer? We still have no seen them!
PermalinkPermalink 2009-10-20 @ 11:11
Comment from: Michael ELLESTAD [Member] Email
Well darn I did not know you wanted them too or I would have sent you my odd radius pics.
PermalinkPermalink 2009-10-20 @ 23:57
Comment from: Walt Tape [Visitor] Email
I put some ideas about the newly reported halo at:

http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~carltape/personal/misc/KernETC2009-10-20.pdf

Maybe better understanding will suggest a reasonable name for the thing.
PermalinkPermalink 2009-10-28 @ 23:40
Comment from: marko riikonen [Visitor] Email
Thanks Walt. That's a pretty thorough response. I am still trying to get my head straight with a couple of details on it, but I think I got the large picture.

Maybe next you could do the family of 3-5-1 type 46 Parry arcs? I feel we should not write any papers on these new halos before Walt has provided his insight on them... The rest of us are little children playing with nice toys and Walt is the guy sitting on the bench and looking after us.
PermalinkPermalink 2009-10-29 @ 22:48
Comment from: Walt Tape [Visitor] Email
Thanks, Marko, but, on the contrary, it is you who is leading the charge.
PermalinkPermalink 2009-10-30 @ 01:11
Comment from: marko riikonen [Visitor] Email
Ok, think I got it! Took overnights sleep, though. The thing that bothered me was the different sized circles in figure 3. But now I see that they represent circumzenith and Kern arcs at different sun elevations. Smallest circle is equal to the sun elevation 32 degs and largest to sun elevation 0 degs. What size circle you get depends on what atzimuthal direction the crystal is pointing. Is that it?

Now I am also starting to grasp what you said (in an email some time ago) about the connection of diffuse arcs and parhelic circle.
PermalinkPermalink 2009-10-30 @ 11:37
Comment from: jukka ruoskanen [Visitor] Email
Beautiful treatment allright! Especially fig. 6 is a magnificient illustration.
PermalinkPermalink 2009-10-31 @ 07:44
Comment from: Michael ELLESTAD [Member] Email
Interesting graphics on the the reflected 46d arcs. Hey Walter have you ever got elliptical halo before?
PermalinkPermalink 2009-11-02 @ 04:17
Comment from: Walt Tape [Visitor] Email
In a new pdf (same file name) I added some of the Parry arcs that Marko was talking about in his 2009-10-29 @22:48 comment. See

http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~carltape/personal/misc/KernETC2009-10-20.pdf

Yes, Marko, you had the idea exactly right in your 2009-10-30 @11:37 comment.

And, Michael, you have probably seen more elliptical halos than I have.

Walt
PermalinkPermalink 2009-11-06 @ 03:37
Comment from: marko riikonen [Visitor] Email
This takes another nights sleep to digest.
PermalinkPermalink 2009-11-07 @ 17:52
Comment from: Anne [Visitor] Email · http://www.rapidsharemix.com
Thank you very much for this easy to follow guide, it was very usefull.
PermalinkPermalink 2009-12-18 @ 14:34

Leave a comment:

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.

Allowed XHTML tags: <p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small>
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email and url)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will NOT be displayed.))

Ice Crystal Halos

Have you observed a halo display? Do you have halo photographs that you think might interest others? Send us a sample.

Search

Categories

Misc

XML Feeds

What is RSS?

Who's Online?

  • Guest Users: 33

powered by
b2evolution